Decimal expansion of pi

Today, no docs, nothing special, a couple of updates on thinking.

Firstly, see: and for reference. Finally refer to How can we expect prodigy killer action from these?

If we were to find all next primes in the very expansion, that’d be more appealing, albeit still – it’s decimal approach. And we know (from experience, though) that multiplication measures applied to primes equal (currently) unsolved problems (eg. the Goldbach Conjecture).

Thus, I recently tried to approach all these from a different perspective. Firstly, it’s trivial to notice that the GC is equivalent to p= {{p_1+p_2}\over{2}}-{{p_3+p_4}\over{2}}. Assuming the correctness of the former (even Euler did that), we may notice (due to AM-GM) the geometrical connections between four different primes. This can be shown as 4p^2=(p_1-p_3)(p_1+p_3)+(p_2-p_4)(p_2+p_4)+2(p_1p_2-p_3p_4), ie. can be shown as sumations of areas of rectangles, which I will show later in my sketch.

But, omitting that observation, I noticed yet another relevant approach. Lets introduce j(t)=\sum\limits_{p} (-1)^{i} \left \lfloor \dfrac {t} {p} \right \rfloor , where i \in N means i-th prime used. It’s straightforward that by inclusion-exclusion we have some sort of representation of the number of primes (because we sieve certain numbers). Considering the function, lets now strike out the floor function, thus we have j(t)=\sum\limits_{p}{{t}\over{p}}(-1)^{i} , (where i indicates i-th prime number, its index) which pinpoints its potential connection to Zeta(2) and I-E representation of pi.

I forgot to post the two limits I have recently had trouble with regarding the introduced triangle:



Assuming the first could be divergent due to the amount of ones, I decided to introduce the second one. Waiting for solutions.

Besides all those, I had found a nice proof for (mine)

Prove that no (x,p), x,p \in N, x\neq 1, with p prime, exist such that x^3+3x^2(1-3p)-2p^2(12x-13p)=0. I have a solution.

Also, as you know, I’m asking a question whether we can create a number with infinite number of divisors, thus contradicting the GC. But, due to our axioms, we can’t (explained by the loop: we can’t create as we could find yet another prime to multiply by). But, can we even imagine such a model where it’d be possible, remembering Russels paradox in the set theory and Cantor’s countability of infinities, ie. primary examples of axiom verification.

Last thing, will also be shown in the sketch later. In one of my visions, I recognized primes as regular geometrical objects, e.g. 5 would be regular pentagon, 7 would be regular heptagon etc. And I wondered how would it be possible to create such mosaics built of such objects? I’m sure I will write about this later, again in this notebook.

About misha

Imagine a story that one can't believe. Hi. Life changes here. Small things only.
This entry was posted in Mathematics. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Decimal expansion of pi

  1. Cialis says:

    Hallo everyone! I really like what you’re writing here. Keep sharing that way.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s